$54M Pants

Yes, some fool sued a dry cleaner for $54 million in damages because of a lost pair of pants. He lost, fortunately. And the plaintiff was a judge. I guess "judgment" is optional when they make you a judge, because this fool seriously lacks it.

I quote U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform President Lisa A. Rickard from the article: "Some will say this outcome proves the system worked, and justice was served. To the contrary, this case only proves that the system is truly broken and in bad need of repair." Can I get an amen?

I am reminded of a fictional legal system invented by Frank Herbert. I think he first mentioned it in the novel Whipping Star, but I know it comes into play in a few of his novels. The Gowachin are a frog-like race, and in their system the losing attorney, regardless of the side he represents, suffers the penalty. Murder trial? You better be sure you can convict, because if not, they execute you. Sue someone for millions? You will definitely be putting your money where your mouth is.

Just a thought.

BTW, you should check out these lesser-known Herbert novels. In my library he ranks right up there with Asimov and Heinlein. Yeah, I'm old.